Effects of Lip Bumpers on Mandibular Crowding in mixed Dentition (Synopsis)

Synopsis on Effects of Lip Bumpers on Mandibular Crowding in mixed Dentition.

Introduction / Background
INTRODUCTION: Orthodontists have always been faced with the problem of straightening crowded teeth. The degree of mandibular crowding can be determined by tooth siza arch length discrepancy. The mandibular arch has constraints that make correction of crowding more difficult than maxilla. These constraints are increased bone density leading to slower overall tooth movement as well as constraints over the amount of expansion by overlying maxillary arch. Thus mandibular arch considered as diagnostic arch and should be the determining factor for maxillary arch alignment as well as template for upper form. The determination of factors contributing to mandibular crowding especially in mixed dentition stage is of great importance in treatment planning. The position and stability of the teeth are infllienced by the equilibrium between their surrounding muscular forces by orbicularis oris and buccinator balanced by opposing forces of tongue. Different treatment modalities can be carried out to give relief through orthodontic and orthopedic treatment, some of which include tooth extraction, expansion, interproximal enamel stripping, flaring incisors and uprighting molars. A recent trend in orthodontics is the reemergence of non extraction treatment since many patients has significant crowding more focus has been placed on developing the arches through expansion therapy lip bumpers or more technically called labial vestibular appliances have traditionally been used to distal drive lower molars and to protect the “Anchorage” of posterior segments in lower arch . The use of lip bumper and its effects are well documented traditionally used as anchorage control, to maintain position of first molars and leeway space ofr prevention of lip habits for vertical control of molars or to produce molar rotation. Lip bumper acts, by giving relief of soft tissues pressure on teeth, thus equilibrium between tongue and lip and cheek pressure is altered which results in dentoalveolar widening and remodeling so giving relief to moderately crowding arch.
Objectives
1.objective of my study is to give relief of crowding at a stage where both decidous and permanent teeth are present
Material and Methods
Hypothesis
Lip bumper in lower arch gives relief of crowding in just six month at a mixed dentition stage of 6-11 years of age.
Study Design : Case Control Study
Sample Size : 30 patients into 2 groups of 15 patients each
Sampling Method : Simple random probability sampling
Duration of Study : 9 months from date of approval of synopsis
Inclusion Criteria
• Lower anterior crowding at mixed dentition stage
Exclusion Criteria
• Well aligned lower arch
• Class III skeletal patterns
• Conglutilly missing supernumery teeth
Data Collection Procedure
Mandibular arch length would be measured by summing both the right and left distances from mesial contact points of first pelm moar to the contact points of central incisor or to mid point of centrals if spaced.
Arch wid the measured by distances between two reproducible landworks located near cusp tips of both laniues on lower occlusal views and casts . distalization of molars will be measured on frontal ceph by comparing the Ag-Ag points pre and post treatment.
Statistical Methods
The study will be compiled and analysed by SPSS-12, and student t test for following variabals
Similar Preliminary Studies
References:
1.O Donnell S, Nanda Rs, Ghosh J.
Perioral forces and dental changes resulting from mandibular lip bumper
treatment.
A m J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1998; 113:247-255
[PubMed Citation]
2. Davidavitch M, Mclnnis D, Lindauer SJ The effects of lip bumper therapy in the mixed dentition. Am J Ortho
1997; 111 : 52-58.
3. Chen JY, Will LA, Niederman R. Analysisi of efficacy of functional appliances on mandibular growth. Am J Orthod Dentofacial orthop. 2002;122:470-476
[PubMed citation]

4. Cetlin NM, Spena R, Vanarsdall RL Jr. Nonextration treatment. In : Graber TM,
Robert J, vanarsdall L, eds.
Orthodontics current principles and techniques St Louis, Mo; Mosby 749-777,2000.

5. Murphy CC, Magness WB, ENGLISH JD, Fazier- Bowers SA, Sales AM. A longitudual study of incremental expansion using a mandibular lip bumper. Agnle orhthod.2003;73:396-400. [PubMed gtation]

6. Geretry RG. Non Extraction treatment:
utilization of lip bumper to establish the mandibular arch J Gen orthod. 1997;8:6-12.
7. Magnass WB. Passive mandibular expansion:
Individualizing archform. J Clin Orthod. 2000;34:461-468.[PubMed citation]

8. Soloman MJ, English JD, Magness WB, Mcke CJ.
Long term stability of lip bumper therapy followed by fixed appliances. Angle orthod 2005








Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *